editorial
Editorial policy
Editorial explanation should make the data easier to understand without overstating certainty, hiding missing inputs, or altering source facts.
Evidence and language
Editorial text should distinguish observed facts, algorithmic outputs, and interpretation. Assertions about current conditions must be traceable to an approved source and should include the relevant observation time, freshness state, or uncertainty when those details materially affect meaning.
Headlines and summaries should be proportional to the evidence. Missing data cannot become evidence of safety, provisional results cannot be described as complete, and a global score cannot replace local warnings. Humor may support the site voice, but it must not obscure limitations or emergency information.
Review and publication
A page is eligible for indexing only when its structured content passes the quality checks, its review metadata is complete, its publication status is published, and the matching page-registry row is explicitly published. Failure or unavailability at any step is closed by default with noindex and sitemap exclusion.
Machine-generated drafts, bulk location pages, thin summaries, and unreviewed translations do not receive publication status automatically. Material updates should refresh review information and preserve a stable content identity so corrections and translations remain traceable.